People v. Stewart
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the case remitted to Supreme Court for resentencing.
A defendant has the right to be present at all material stages of trial (see People v Ciaccio, 47 NY2d 431, 436 [1979]), including sentencing {see CPL 380.40 [1]). We recently held that a defendant who has been convicted of a felony may waive his right to be present at sentencing, but must do so “expressly” (People v Rossborough, 27 NY3d 485, 488 [2016]). The same principle applies in resentencing. The People do not contend otherwise, but insist that an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. CiaccioNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. CorleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. StromanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- The People v. Ronald D. RossboroughNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. OusmaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. UmarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
- People v. BerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.