Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Odora Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 12, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We find that the three defenses attacked are insufficient in law. (See Pollitz V. Wabash Bailroad Go., No. 1,150 App. Div. 709; Pollitz v. Wabash Bailroad Co., No. 2, 150 App. Div. 715.) Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by granting plaintiff’^ cross motion to dismiss said defenses and by denying examination of plaintiff before trial on item 8 in said order and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and dsibursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pollitz v. Wabash RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Pollitz v. Wabash RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pfeiffer v. BerkeNew York Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Mt. Zion Baptist Church of Port Chester, Inc. v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1959