Friedman v. Odora Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
We find that the three defenses attacked are insufficient in law. (See Pollitz V. Wabash Bailroad Go., No. 1,150 App. Div. 709; Pollitz v. Wabash Bailroad Co., No. 2, 150 App. Div. 715.) Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by granting plaintiff’^ cross motion to dismiss said defenses and by denying examination of plaintiff before trial on item 8 in said order and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and dsibursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pollitz v. Wabash RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Pollitz v. Wabash RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pfeiffer v. BerkeNew York Supreme Court · 1953
- Mt. Zion Baptist Church of Port Chester, Inc. v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1959