Legal Opinion

Leerdam v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 17, 2004No. 2D03-3894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Judge.

Clarence William Leerdam appeals his convictions of two counts of attempted first-degree murder, one count of armed burglary, and one count of violating a final injunction for protection. First, he contends that he was deprived of his right to confer with counsel during a trial recess. Applying Florida law in light of United States Supreme Court precedent, we find that the error was harmless. Second, Leerdam contends that the State elicited an impermissible comment on his post-Miranda1 silence, but he does not demonstrate error. Accordingly, we affirm.

At approximately 2 a.m. on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jonathan A. Knight v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Albert Mears v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. CARLOS CADAVID v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API