Legal Opinion

Boscarino v. Neo-Line Products Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1957Published

1Opinion of the CourtCharles J. Beckinella, J.

This is a motion by one of the defendants to dismiss the complaint under rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint alleges that one of the plaintiffs invented a wax applier, filed for letters patent, assigned his interest to plaintiff Carin Enterprises, which licensed the plaintiff Feed-O-Matic Corp. of America to manufacture and sell same; that the latter corporation subsequently entered into a contract with defendant Neo-Line Products Corp. for the manufacture of moulds, tools and dies; that the last-named…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  2. Bristol v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Hammond v. Town of CaldwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Lenkiewicz v. WiktorekNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Klein v. Ekco Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API