Legal Opinion

Buxton Limitida v. Rederi

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 7, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

Claimants and respondents move for an order “dismissing the libel on the ground *441that the said libel was not filed within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action thereon.” The libel is for damages to a shipment of eight automobiles transported on the S. S. “Argentino” from the port of New York to the port of Buenos Aires, Argentina. It is alleged that the automobiles were not delivered in like good order as when shipped. The bill of lading contained the following clause: “8A. Written notice of claim for loss or damage must be given to this carrier or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Teer v. George A. Fuller Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. The ArgentinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API