Legal Opinion

United States v. $90,000 in U.S. Currency

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 30, 2014No. Civil No. WDQ-11-2210PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAM D. QUARLES, JR., District Judge.

The Government seeks to recover $90,000 in U.S. Currency which it asserts was the product of illegal drug trafficking. Pending are the Government’s motion to dismiss Latía Bowles’s claim against the defendant property for lack of standing and to strike portions of the answer as frivolous, the Claimant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw appearance, and the Government’s motion for summary judgment. No hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.2011). For the following reasons, the Government’s motion to dismiss will be granted in part…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. CarrellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. UNITED STATES of America v. $487,825.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY David Aguasviva, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. $5,730.00 in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. 12636 Sunset Avenue, Unit E-2District Court, D. Maryland · 2014

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. All Assets Held in Account No. XXXXXXXX, in the Name of Doraville Props. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. All Assets Held in Account Number 80020796, in the Name of Doraville Properties Corporation, at Deutsche Bank International, Limited in Jersey, Channel Islands, and All Interest, Benefits or Assets TrDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API