Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1929No. 13,719Published

1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.

Appellant was prosecuted on an affidavit charging sale of intoxicating liquors, in violation of §4 of the Prohibition Act (Acts 1925 p. 144, §2717 Burns 1926). Trial resulted in a verdict and judgment of guilty. Overruling motion for new trial is assigned as error.

In support of his contention that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for new trial, appellant relies on specifications in the motion which require an examination of the evidence. It is contended by the State that the questions sought to be presented cannot be considered for the reason that the bill of exceptions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Moore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Mikesell v. South Bend Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API