Legal Opinion · Concurrence

King v. Whitfield

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 18, 1999No. 99-359Published

1ConcurrenceTom Glaze, Justice

I concur, and write to stice, Arkansas law that controls election contests like the case before us. First, it must be emphasized that an election contest is a statutory or special proceeding under Ark. R. Civ. P. 81. Rule 81 provides that the rules of civil procedure do not apply where a statute specifically creates a right, remedy, or proceeding that provides a different procedure. See Rubens v. Hodges, 310 Ark. 451, 837 S.W.2d 465 (1992). This court has also held that the procedure for contesting an election is purely statutory, and a strict observance of statutory requirements is essential…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Files v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Rubens v. HodgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Reed v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  4. McClendon v. McKeownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  5. Jones v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API