Legal Opinion
Rose M. Salazar v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 17, 1976No. 75-2561PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before KILKENNY and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and CARR, * District Judge. KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying appellant’s motion under Rule 4(a), FRAP, for additional time in which to file a notice of appeal.
FACTS
There is no material dispute in the facts. Appellant filed a Title VII action against the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) alleging job discrimination on the basis of sex and national origin. On January 24, 1975, after trial, judgment was entered against appellant. On March 4th, the district court permitted appellant’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- James P. Pasquale v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Carl H. Alley v. Dodge HotelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Stirling v. Chemical BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Lavina TOROCKIO Et Al., Appellants, v. CHAMBERLAIN MFG. CO., a Corp., Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Larry O. KurtenbachCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Laurence John LaytonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Estate Butler's Tire & Battery Co., Inc. v. Ferrous Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Jack Leon LucasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Andrew W. Pettibone v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Warden of Oregon State Penitentiary, and James A. Redden, Attorney General of the State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Dehn v. Otter Tail Power Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.