Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Banks

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 27, 2009No. 578 CAPPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 27th day of August, 2009, the proposed findings that the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County set forth contemporaneously with its “order” of September 8, 2008 and then referenced in its “order” of December 23, 2008 are hereby rejected. The presiding judge, former Judge Michael T. Conahan, simply adopted appellee George Banks’ counsel’s proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law wholesale as his purported “Determination on Competency Issues.” That performance violated this Court’s oft-repeated requirement of an autonomous judicial expression of the reasons for…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. MillnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Spaulding v. ButlerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. BanksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. In Re: Magisterial District Judge Mark BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API