Musgrove v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT
In Rogers v. State, 630 So.2d 88 (Ala. 1992), the Alabama Supreme Court, reversing this Court's decision, held that the trial court properly admitted the evidence of flight and the evidence of the other collateral offenses in the instant case and remanded the cause for proceedings consistent with that opinion. Therefore, we are now addressing the remaining issues raised on appeal.
I
Appellant Musgrove argues that the admission of Rogers's confession at their consolidated trial requires that the judgment be reversed, because, he says, its admission…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Melson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
- In re CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- McNabb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Hardy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.