Hebert v. Richard
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PAINTER, Judge.
11 Plaintiffs, Tommie Hebert and his wife, Melissa Anne Hebert, appeal the trial court’s rulings on motions for summary judgment on the issues of employment status/tort immunity, intentional tort, and spoliation of the evidence. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In March of 2007, Mr. Hebert sustained multiple injuries when he fell to the ground from a moving helicopter which was owned by his employer, Industrial Helicopters, Inc. (Industrial). Industrial’s principal business was aerial…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Bazley v. TortorichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Cochran v. Pelican Well Tool & Supply Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Reeves v. Structural Preservation SystemsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hebert v. RichardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Jorge-Chavelas v. La. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2018
- Hebert v. RichardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Driesse v. National Oil Well Yarco, LPLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Craig Driesse v. National Oilwell Varco, LpLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.