Legal Opinion
State v. Patterson
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 22, 1993No. 10752; 10855PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The defendant appeals from his conviction, after a trial to the jury, of possession of marijuana with intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (b).1 The defendant was also charged with *280possession of marijuana in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (c),2 and was acquitted of that charge. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) concluded that the state had not dis-criminatorily employed a peremptory challenge to exclude a black venireperson from the jury, (2) failed to set aside legally inconsistent verdicts, (3) failed to suppress the fruits of…
2Cases cited135 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. CatorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. CalderonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- People v. SalyerColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.