Legal Opinion

Carleton Ford, Inc. v. Oste

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 25, 1973PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant alleges an exception to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict after a jury trial in an action of contract based on a check drawn by the defendant. The check contains on the top left-hand side a printed legend “Oste Bros.” and beneath it an address. The defendant’s signature appears on the bottom right-hand side; there is nothing to indicate that the signature was in a representative capacity. The short answer to the defendant’s sole contention that the .plaintiff did not make out a case that the defendant, rather than “Oste Bros.,” was personally liable on the check is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Amari v. AngelineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. First Safety Fund National Bank v. FrielMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  2. Colonial Baking Co. of Des Moines v. DowieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co. v. PlotkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Norfolk County Trust Co. v. VichinskyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  5. In Re TurnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API