Legal Opinion

Appeal of Estate of Blair

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided September 23, 1926No. Docket No. 2440PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*960OPINION.

Steenhagen: The Commissioner fixed the value of the stock at the date of death at $75 a share, which the petitioner says is too high, because it reflects the amount of the insurance as among the corporate assets. We can not as a matter of law say that the valuation of a share of stock must exclude such an asset. That the right of the beneficiary under a policy is an asset seems clear. In re Reed’s Estate, 243 N. Y. 199; 153 N. E. 47. Whether at any given time it is worth its face or its surrender value or something between is a matter of fact requiring proof. It can well be imagined…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Transfer Tax Upon the Estate of ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laird v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  2. Blair v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  3. Buck v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
  4. United States v. RamsayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API