Legal Opinion

Talley & Baugham, Inc. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1930Published

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The plaintiff, having offered evidence tending to show that the defendant omitted and neglected to transport the shipment in question within the “ordinary time required” (Stone v. R. R., 144 N. C., 220, 56 S. E., 932), and damage resulting therefrom, was entitled to go to the jury. Jenkins v. R. R., 146 N. C., 178, 59 S. E., 663; Meredith v. R. R., 137 N. C., 478, 50 S. E., 1.

The case of Shaw v. Express Co., 171 N. C., 216, 88 S. E., 222, strongly relied upon by the defendant, is neither controlling nor in point, as the facts of that case readily distinguish it from the one at bar.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meredith v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Stone & Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Jenkins v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Shaw v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API