Legal Opinion

Duke v. Automobile Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 22, 1918No. 8743PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Attachment; from city court of Floyd county — Judge Nunnally. March 20, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. In cases of attachment, the giving of a replevy bond, the filing of a general demurrer, and an answer, without protestation, each operates to convert the action from a suit in rem into an action in personam; and in such case, though the attachment itself may fail, the suit on the declaration is still maintainable. McAndrew v. Irish-American Bank, 117 Ga. 510 (43 S. E. 858); Cincinnati Railway Co. v. Pless, 3 Ga. App. 400 (60 S. E. 8); Philip Carey Co. v. Sheppard, 19 Ga. App. 368 (91 S. E. 444); Falligant v. Blitch, 19 Ga. App. 675 (91 S. E. 1057).

2. But where the allegations of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Pless & SladeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. McAndrew v. Irish-American BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Philip Carey Co. v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Falligant v. BlitchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Busby & Son v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Worley Bros. Granite Co. v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Harper v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  4. Lancaster v. NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Blakely Milling & Trading Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API