Duke v. Automobile Supply Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Attachment; from city court of Floyd county — Judge Nunnally. March 20, 1917.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.
1. In cases of attachment, the giving of a replevy bond, the filing of a general demurrer, and an answer, without protestation, each operates to convert the action from a suit in rem into an action in personam; and in such case, though the attachment itself may fail, the suit on the declaration is still maintainable. McAndrew v. Irish-American Bank, 117 Ga. 510 (43 S. E. 858); Cincinnati Railway Co. v. Pless, 3 Ga. App. 400 (60 S. E. 8); Philip Carey Co. v. Sheppard, 19 Ga. App. 368 (91 S. E. 444); Falligant v. Blitch, 19 Ga. App. 675 (91 S. E. 1057).
2. But where the allegations of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Pless & SladeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- McAndrew v. Irish-American BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Philip Carey Co. v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Falligant v. BlitchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Busby & Son v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Worley Bros. Granite Co. v. HaskinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Harper v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Lancaster v. NealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Blakely Milling & Trading Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925