Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Bartholomew

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 11, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pierson R. Hildreth, S.

It appears that the propounded instrument was duly executed and that at the time of execution thereof the decedent was in all respects competent to make a will and not under restraint. The genuineness of the will and the validity of its execution having been shown to the satisfaction of the Surrogate it is admitted to probate. (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 144; Decedent Estate Law, § 21.)

A question arises concerning appointment of the executor. The testator left his entire estate to his sister as sole legatee and devisee. The will dated July 31, 1961, named such sister…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of ReevesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API