Legal Opinion

Jamison v. Monarch Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 5, 1982No. 4784-9-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, C.J.

William and Alma Jamison appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Monarch Life Insurance Co. (Monarch).

The Jamisons were insureds of Monarch. On May 16, 1975, Mrs. Jamison had congestive heart failure and underwent open heart surgery to correct a dysfunctional mitral valve caused by childhood rheumatic fever. Her natural valve was replaced with a Bjork-Shiley prosthetic valve. Thereafter, she resumed normal activities but continued to take certain medication and remained under the medical supervision of her family physician and her cardiologist. Her family physician monthly tested…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Fahn v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Zeh v. National Hospital Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tri-State Construction, Inc. v. Columbia Casualty Co./CNACourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  2. Moran v. StowellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. Fair Price House Moving Co. v. PaclebCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API