Legal Opinion
Coenen v. Buckman Building Corporation
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 29, 1967No. 40517Published
1Opinion of the Court
153 N.W.2d 329 (1967)
Leo COENEN, Respondent,
v.
BUCKMAN BUILDING CORPORATION, Appellant.
No. 40517.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
September 29, 1967.
Gordon Rosenmeier and John E. Simonett, Little Falls, for appellant.
George P. Wetzel, Little Falls, for respondent.
OPINION
NELSON, Justice.
Appeal from a judgment of the district court entered pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff. Defendant seeks reversal and entry of judgment in its favor. The appeal does not make application for a new trial.
The accident which resulted in this action occurred when plaintiff stepped into an unlighted furnace…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Ranum v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- City of Winona v. BotzetCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Krueger v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.