Legal Opinion

United States v. Kenneth Givens, Robert Turner, and Guinn Kelly

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 5, 1996No. 95-3760 through 95-3762PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Appellants contend that the district court improperly declared a mistrial and subjected them to double jeopardy by retrying .them. The district court believed that manifest necessity required a mistrial in the defendants’ first trial and therefore rejected appellants’ claims of double jeopardy. We reverse the judgment of the district court as to two defendants, affirm as to the other, and remand.

I

Kenneth Givens, Robert Turner, and Guinn Kelly were members of the Saint Louis Police Department who also worked as security guards at a federal housing project.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Evelyn Louise Long v. Hubert H. Humphrey, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Edward GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Michael Gandolfo AlbaneseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Robert Turner, United States of America v. Guinn KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API