Legal Opinion
In Re the Estate of Riker
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 21, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Ordinary Bigelow and reported in 124 N. J. Eq. 228.
For affirmance — -The Chief-Justice, Case, Bodine, Heiiee, Peeskie, Poetee, Hetfield, Deae, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, Hague, JJ. 11.
For reversal — Donges, Wells, JJ. 2.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. CoryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Camden Trust Co. v. DuboisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1949
- IN THE MATTER OF THE TRUST OF RAY D. POST (P-000817-2012, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018