Legal Opinion

City of Richmond v. Merchants National Bank

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 13, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of city of ' Richmond, on a motion to correct an erroneous assessment. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the Court

Whittle, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case originated in the hustings court with a petition by the Merchants National Bank of Richmond against the city of Richmond, to correct an alleged' erroneous assessment for the year 1915, directly against the bank upon its capital stock, surplus and undivided profits, less the assessed value of its real estate and other deductions allowed by law, instead of being levied and assessed against the shareholders of the stock of the bank upon the value of their shares ascertained as the law prescribes. Moreover, complaint was made that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Aberdeen Bank v. Chehalis CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Talbott v. Silver Bow CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Palmer v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Leesburg v. Loudoun National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  2. First Nat. Bank v. Louisiana Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API