Legal Opinion

State v. Peraza

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 4, 2017No. 17-136PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAUNDERS, JUDGE.

hThis is a case in which Defendant, upon release after arrest, failed to appear for arraignment, the State moved for forfeiture of Defendant’s bond, and the trial court entered judgment of bond forfeiture. Surety subsequently moved to set aside the judgment of bond forfeiture, which the trial court granted. The State appealed.

The sole issue before the court is whether the trial court was legally correct in setting aside a bond forfeiture when the surety failed to timely file its motion pursuant to La.Code Crim.P. art. 349.5, and failed to prove a non-forfeiture situation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bankers Ins. Co. v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Tran v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. State v. KenningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State of Louisiana v. Donovan Paul SampyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  2. State v. SampyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. State v. SampyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API