Legal Opinion

People v. Ortega

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1969No. Docket Nos. 16294, 16552PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, J.

Appellants, Jake Orlando Ortega and Floyd Dan Rodriguez, were jointly charged with a violation of section 211 of the Penal Code (robbery). The information alleged that both appellants were armed with deadly weapons, to wit, guns, at the time of the commission of the offense. Both men entered pleas of not guilty and each made a motion for severance of trial which motions were denied. At a trial by jury appellants were found guilty as charged and the robbery was fixed as in the first degree. The jury further found that each appellant was armed with a deadly weapon at the time…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. CockrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. De SantiagoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. RochaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. People v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. AdreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. People v. OzeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API