Legal Opinion

Beard v. Meridia Huron Hospital

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 2005No. 2004-0048Published

1DissentAlice Robie Resnick, J.

{¶ 46} The court of appeals fully appreciated the nuances of the issue presented, applied the relevant precedents precisely as they should have been applied, and unanimously reached the right result, which was to reverse the jury verdict for appellant, Dr. Oscar Nicholson Jr., and to remand for a new trial. The majority loses focus on the true issue, misperceives the prejudicial nature of the testimony at issue, and reverses a well-reasoned judgment, thereby reinstating a flawed jury verdict. I dissent.

{¶ 47} In Piotrowski v. Corey Hosp. (1961), 172 Ohio St. 61, 15 O.O.2d 126, 173 N.E.2d 355,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pool v. WadeOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Limle v. Laboratory Corporation of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API