Legal Opinion

POURSOHI v. BLINKEN

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 29, 2021No. 3:21-cv-01960Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SEYED AMIR SINA MIRMOTALEBI Case No. 21-cv-01960-TSH POURSOHI, et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 STRIKE v. 10 Re: Dkt. No. 12 ANTONY BLINKEN, 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiffs Seyed Amir Sina Mirmotalebi Poursohi and Fatemehsadat Mirmotalebi bring this 15 petition for writ of mandamus to compel Defendant Antony Blinken to adjudicate Mirmotalebi’s 16 immigrant visa application. ECF No. 1. They now move to strike Defendant’s answer pursuant to 17 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). ECF…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,118 Robert H. Wyshak v. City National Bank, Robert H. Wyshak, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee v. City National Bank, Defendant-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  5. In Re 2TheMart. Com, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API