Legal Opinion

Reid v. Hindt

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 26, 2009No. 408, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERGER, Justice.

In this appeal we consider whether the trial court violated plaintiffs right to a jury trial by granting defendant’s motion for additur after a jury award of zero damages in a personal injury action. Appellant, plaintiff below, had moved for a new trial, and opposed the additur motion. Nonetheless, the Superior Court awarded $2,500 in additur, and gave defendant the option of consenting to the award in lieu of a new trial. Although typically plaintiffs move for additur and defendants move for remittitur, either party may seek that relief, or the trial court may impose additur…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Money v. Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation Trust FundSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Turnbull v. FinkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  4. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. Acro Extrusion Corp. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rash v. MoczulskiSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  2. Gibson v. Metropolitan Group Property and Casualty Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
  3. Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  4. Salt Meadows Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Zonko Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2023
  5. Schoenborn v. SchoenbornSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API