Legal Opinion
Arnold v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 5, 1980No. 60011PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
Appellant appeals his conviction of aggravated assault and robbery.
1. Appellant enumerates as error the denial of his motion to suppress evidence concerning a pre-indictment line-up and a voice identification procedure. It is first urged that the motions should have been granted because both identification procedures were conducted without counsel being present, in violation of appellant’s Sixth Amendment rights. This argument is without merit. Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U. S. 682 (92 SC 1877, 32 LE2d 411) (1972); Wimberly v. State, 233 Ga. 386 (211 SE2d 281) (1974); Wilson v.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Reese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. LutherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wiley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Huff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Georgia Ports Authority v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.