Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Bradford

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1972No. Docket Nos. 9367, 9673PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KONGSGAARD, J. *

Following a trial by jury defendants Ervin and Bradford were convicted of violating Penal Code sections 21 1 (robbery); 245, subdivision (a) (assault with a deadly weapon); 245, subdivision (b) (assault with a deadly weapon on a peace officer); and 12020 (possession of a sawed-off' shotgun). A third co-defendant, Brown, was charged with the same offenses but the jury was unable to reach a verdict on any of the charges against Brown and a new trial was ordered for him.

Prior to trial defendants Bradford and Brown moved to suppress evidence under Penal Code section 1538.5.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. PrettymanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. People v. EscuderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. TheodosopoulosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. People v. MylesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API