Stoll v. MacPherson Duck Club, Ltd.
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
VAN CISE, Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action to quiet their title to, and to confirm their rights in, the Putnam Drainage Ditch, particularly that portion flowing through property owned by defendant MacPherson Duck Club, Ltd. (the Club), and their correlative rights of entry for maintenance of the ditch. They also sought to enjoin defendants from interfering with the flow of drainage water in the ditch, from obstructing the ditch or altering its historic course and grade, and from interfering with plaintiffs’ rights to maintain the ditch within a strip of land extending 30 feet on each side…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graybill v. CorlettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- Hankins v. BorlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- City of Boulder v. Boulder & White Rock Ditch & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Knudson v. FrostSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Ambrosio v. Perl-Mack Construction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.