Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Johnigan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 2005No. Docket Nos. 240909, 251408Published

1Concurrence

SCHUETTE, EJ.

(concurring). I join in the conclusions reached in the lead opinion authored by my distinguished colleague, Judge DAVID H. SAWYER. However, as eloquent as he is, equaled only by the pen of my distinguished colleague Judge PETER D. O’CONNELL, I refrain from engaging in the legal colloquy concerning the application of People v Mack, 265 Mich App 122; 695 NW2d 345 (2005), and People v Houston, 261 Mich App 463; 683 NW2d 192 (2004), and the errors, if any, contained in those opinions. Neither Mack nor Houston is dispositive of the case at bar. Further, there is no reason to declare a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. MacKMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. People v. HoustonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. HoustonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API