Legal Opinion

Doe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 1, 1981No. UU-415PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant having properly preserved the point on appeal, we reverse and remand for further proceedings pursuant to Tascano v. State, 393 So.2d 540 (Fla.1980); however, in accordance with this court’s opinion in Studstill v. State, 397 So.2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1981), we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court:

Can an appellate court apply the harmless error doctrine, Section 924.33 and Section 59.041, Florida Statutes (1979), to the failure of a trial court to give the jury instruction required by Rule 3.390(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, if the appellant’s guilt…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tascano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Studstill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API