Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. State

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 30, 1918No. 8892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from County Court, Grant Ooun-iy; C. AV. Stephenson, Judge. The county attorney of Grant county filed information on behalf of the State as plaintiff against Jacob M. Dickinson and II. TJ. Mudge, receivers of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for complainant, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

STEWART, O.

On (he ,16th day of October, 1915, the county attorney of Grant county, Okla., filed a duly verified information in the county court of such county against the defendants reading as follows, to wit:.“I, the undersigned, county attorney of said county, in the name, and by the authority, and on behalf, of the state of Oklahoma, give the court to know and be informed; That Jacob M. Dickinson and H. D. Mudge are the legally appointed, duly qualified, and acting receivers of the Chicago. Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, a corporation. That said Jacob M. Dick.nson and H.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. State v. ZillmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. In Re SeagravesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dickinson v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API