Resendez v. Johnson
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch
We granted the petitions for review in this interlocutory appeal to consider whether excessive corporal punishment may violate a student’s substantive due process rights. But this Court’s jurisdiction over interlocutory appeals is limited. Without a dissent or a conflict, the court of appeals’ decision is final. 1 Here, there is no dissent, and we conclude that the parties’ jurisdictional arguments rely on conflicts that do not exist. Accordingly, we withdraw our order granting the petitions as improvidently granted, and dismiss the petitions for want of jurisdiction.
Ernesto and Maria…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Dallas Cty. Mental Health and Mental Retardation v. BossleyTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Tyler v. LikesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- Thomas v. OldhamTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Leleaux v. Hamshire-Fannett Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- TX. Nat. Res. Con. Com'n v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Potter County Attorney's Office v. Stars & Stripes Sweepstakes, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2003
- Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. HorwoodTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Texas a & M University System v. Koseoglu, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Amador Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.