Legal Opinion

Brett v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 12, 1972No. 56194PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schwartz

Plaintiff seeks to recover for injuries sustained when she tripped and fell in defendant’s store at 221 South State Street, in Chicago. The case was tried by a jury and a verdict of $40,000 was returned. The trial court entered a judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict, and also entered an order granting a conditional new trial pursuant to Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 110, par. 68.1(6), which provides that the court must rule conditionally on other requested post-trial relief in the event its unconditional ruling on a portion of such requested relief is held erroneous. We proceed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. McInturff v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  3. Robinson v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  4. Celner v. PratherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  5. River v. Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kimbrough v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Wiegman v. Hitch-Inn Post of Libertyville, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Ordman v. Dacon Management Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Vance v. Lucky Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Canzoneri v. Village of Franklin ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API