Legal Opinion

Foster v. Adcock

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Defendant is a five year old minor, who was injured in an automobile accident. Suits for damages resulted, in recoveries by the father of $250, and for the infant of $400, less an allowance of $100 to Attorneys, $300 of this latter sum was paid into Court for the minor. The father paid to the physician who attended the child $100, on account of a bill rendered by the physician for these services, in the total sum of $220. This bill was brought by the physician to impound the minor’s fund in court and subject enough thereof to satisfy this unpaid balance of his charge. On the hearing the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. CaseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Wallace v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. State v. BarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Garay v. OverholtzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Wolfe v. VaughnTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Madison General Hospital v. HaackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Gardner v. FlowersTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Grant v. Kia Motors Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API