A & M Consultants, Inc. of La. v. Coco
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GROVER L. COVINGTON, Chief Judge.
The basic issue in these consolidated suits on appeal is whether the trial judge correctly interpreted the instruments in question, an act of sale with mortgage and a promissory note in connection with the mortgage. We find that he did.
After a thorough review and evaluation of the record, we are convinced that the evidence supports the facts found and the reasons for judgment assigned by the trial judge, a copy of which is attached hereto.
We affirm at appellant’s costs.
AFFIRMED.
2ConcurrenceShortess, J.
APPENDIX
21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
PARISH OF TANGIPAHOA
STATE OF LOUISIANA
Nos.…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Sternberg v. MasonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Daigle & Associates, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
- Jaccuzzo v. FabregasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
- Williams v. Natchitoches Recreational Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
4Cited by2 opinions
- Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- A & M Consultants, Inc. of La. v. CocoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986