Legal Opinion

Crusselle v. Chastain

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 1, 1886Published

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, C. J.

Where suit was brought in a Justice’s Court against a married woman, and the only cause of action set out was by attaching to the summons three promissory notes, one of which was signed by her husband, and the other two signed by him with the addition of the word “ trustee ” to his name, but in neither of which her name appeared, there could be no recovery against the defendant, and on certiorari there was no error in rendering final judgment to that effect. Code, §4067.(a) The addition of the word “ trustee ” after the name of the signer of a note, without more, is mere descriptio personse,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleaveland v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  2. Winslow v. O'PrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API