Massey v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DREW, Justice.
Writ of certiorari has issued in this cause and argument has been heard on jurisdiction and merits. Petitioner first asserts conflict between this decision, sustaining summary judgment for the defendant railroad in a negligence action, and Brown v. Loftin, 154 Fla. 621, 18 So.2d 540, an application of the “standing train” doctrine, as subsequently modified. Hutton v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co., Fla.1957, 92 So.2d 528; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Johnston, Fla.1954, 74 So.2d 689; Horton v. Louisville & N. R. Co., Fla.1952, 61 So.2d 406; Goff v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. City of Daytona BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Brown v. LoftinSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Goff v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Hutton v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Florida Power Corp. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Webster v. CSX TransportationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999