Tatum v. Brooker
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to St. Charles Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Judge
The plaintiff sued for the purchase money of a gold mining claim in Montana Territory, which he alleged he sold to the *149defendant for the price of seven hundred dollars in gold dust, claiming the value thereof to be one thousand and fifteen dollars, for which he asked judgment. •
The defendant denied the sale and all the allegations in plaintiff’s petition. The case was tried before the court sitting as a jury. The testimony was conflicting as to the character of the sale. For the plaintiff it was maintained that the sale was absolute, while the defendant endeavored to show that it was…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Walker v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- McKinnon v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Johnson v. ReadingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
- Adair v. AdairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Marks v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.