Johnson v. Peter
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 WAYNE JOHNSON, et al., CASE NO. C21-1602-LK 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 12 v. AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR DEFAULT 13 GILBERT PETER, JUDGMENT 14 Defendant. 15 16 This matter comes before the Court on a motion for default judgment filed by Plaintiffs 17 Wayne and Bethany Johnson, a married couple. Dkt. No. 14. Defendant Gilbert Peter has not 18 appeared or responded to the motion. The Court grants in part and denies in part the motion and 19 enters a default judgment as set forth below. 20…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.