Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Personal Finance Co. of Columbus, Ga. v. Gibson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1933No. 5 Div. 894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1ConcurrenceSamford, Judge

J., in the very persuasive opinion prepared by him in this case.

The statement of the case is fully and fairly stated by BRICKEN, P. J., in the opinion prepared by him. As to the statement of the case therein, we agree, but the conclusions of law therein stated are not in accord with the law as we find it.

It being admitted that the contract for the payment of interest was a binding contract between the parties under the laws of Georgia where the contract was made and to be performed, the same remained a binding contract everywhere and could be enforced as such in the courts of this state.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. J. R. Watkins Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Alger-Sullivan Lumber Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. United States Savings & Loan Co. v. BeckleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. Dollahite-Levy Co. v. OvertonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trinidad Industrial Bank v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Monarch Refrigerating Co. v. FaulkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Personal Finance Co. of Columbus, Ga. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API