Legal Opinion
In re Gold
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 17, 1998PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent, who appears pro se, was admitted to the practice *75of law in the State of New York by the Third Judicial Department on December 8, 1987. He was also admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New Jersey. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee seeks an order, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.3, suspending respondent for six months predicated upon the fact that he was similarly disciplined by the Supreme Court…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- In re ReissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
4Cited by10 opinions
- In re DranovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re IoannouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re GoldsmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of StasiukAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.