Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Detty

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2002No. 2002-0331PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} In December 2000, respondent, John Detty of Jackson, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0022112, was romantically involved with the plaintiff in a divorce case pending before a judge of the court of common pleas in that county. Respondent was active in party politics and later that month would become a member of his party’s county executive committee.

*58{¶ 2} Respondent approached the judge, who was a member of respondent’s political party, and told him that he was concerned about the manner in which the judge’s magistrate was conducting the divorce case. Specifically, because of accusations…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. DettyOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BunstineOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. BunstineOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. Thomas (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API