State v. Dominick Stanin, Sr.

The defendant, Dominick Stanin, Sr., appeals his conviction following a jury trial in Superior Court ( Ruoff , J.) for first degree assault, see RSA 631:1, I(b) (2016), robbery, see RSA 636:1, I(a), III(a) (2016), and being a felon in possession of a deadly weapon, see RSA 159:3, I(a) (2014). On appeal he argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict him of robbery, and that the trial court erred when it did not individually question each juror about the impact that a photograph-which had not been admitted into evidence, but which was visible in the defense counsel's file-had on that…