Legal Opinion

Mallan v. Higenbotham

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1887PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to District Court, Lake County. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Stalloup, C.

The main question raised by the assignments of error, and discussed and fairly presented for the opinion of this court by the briefs of the respective counsel, is whether there was error in the following proceedings of the district court, to wit: First. Was it error for the court, after the statutory time for answering the plaintiff’s complaint had expired, and without notice to the plaintiff, to permit the defendants to withdraw their demurrer previously filed, and to file instead an answer to the complaint, accompanied by a cross-demand against the plaintiff? Second. Was it…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cates v. MackSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nance v. People ex rel. SheedySupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  2. Taylor v. DerryColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Fischer v. HannaColorado Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Nevitt v. CrowColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. McDonald v. HallicyColorado Court of Appeals · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API