Legal Opinion
DeBrow v. Century 21 Great Lakes, Inc.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 17, 2001No. Docket 114615PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AFTER REMAND
2Per curiam
After the plaintiff was fired from his job, he sued his former employer and others. He alleged seven species of misconduct, including age discrimination. The circuit court granted summary *536disposition in favor of the defendants, and the Court of Appeals has twice affirmed. Because the plaintiff has shown enough to prosecute a claim of age discrimination, we reverse in part the judgments of the Court of Appeals and the circuit court.
i
At the age of forty-eight, plaintiff Paul DeBrow was removed from an executive position in the Century 21 real estate network.1 He sued his former…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by61 opinions
- Hazle v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Sniecinski v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Blair v. Henry Filters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Debano-Griffin v. Lake CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Cuddington v. United Health Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.