Legal Opinion

Britton v. Bullen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 5, 1925No. 8 Div. 780PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The supersedeas and bill of exceptions in this cause were approved and the latter signed September 24, 1924. Eight months later the transcript was filed in the Court of Appeals. But this was six months after the time limited by law for the filing of the transcript (Code 1923, § 6107), and four days after appellee’s motion to affirm had been submitted for decision. The court may for good cause shown extend the time for filing the transcript (Code, § 6103), and may excuse default. But appellant’s affidavit offers no sufficient excuse for the great delay shown in this ease. It is, generally,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hamrick v. Town of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Spruiell v. STANDFORDSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Parker v. BedwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. State v. BartonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API