Legal Opinion

In re Hagop Bogigian Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided May 23, 1900No. 818PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LOWELL, District Judge.

On July 24,1897, the petitioner entered certain oriental goods in the port of Boston, which goods wore examined and entered under the rates of the tariff act of 1894. The proper officer of the custom house indicated by memoranda upon the face of the consular invoice the various rates and duties on the various items of shipment according to the rates fixed by that act. He stamped on the invoice, “l certify that this invoice has been examined, and the articles therein named entered.” He also indicated on the invoice the gross “entered value” of the items or articles. On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Herrman v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Arthur v. SussfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Burgess v. ConverseU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1855

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lothrop v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API